Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s blog publish highlighting the threats he sees artificial intelligence (AI) could pose to humanity has attracted many fiery responses from AI and blockchain community people.
On November. 27, Buterin printed your blog publish entitled My techno-optimism, which discussed how AI is “fundamentally different” using their company inventions like guns, airplanes, and social networking. In addition, Buterin described that could create a new type of “mind,” that could prevent humans and end up being the new apex species.
Your blog publish attracted discussions on various fronts and sparked different sentiments on X (formerly Twitter). Some voiced their agreement using the Ethereum founder, while some shared their criticisms from the publish.
An X account known as Emergent Perspective, which concentrates on occasions online age, responded they accept Buterin’s ideas around the blog publish. Based on the X user, individuals who reason that positive intentions can promise that AI “cannot harm” scare them. “That continues to be the case with practically nothing in history, and will also ‘t be the very first exception,” they added.
I am with @VitalikButerin about this one.
The only real people whose opinions on #AI scare me are those who reason that “Positive Intentions = be certain that AI can perform no harm.”
That’s been the case with practically nothing in history, and will also ‘t be the very first exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
Another X user expressed other worries about AI. A residential area member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X stated that certain of the concerns is the fact that AI may inherently disfavor defense, decentralization, and democracy. Based on the user, AI could accelerate the “wrong intellectual fields,” and humans pushing against it might not be enough.
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. Another community member belittled Buterin and claimed that technology specialists like Buterin “seem to possess a complete disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The city member contended the motivation behind building “morally poor” human encounters is definitely money. The X user advised the city to know both things and individuals and not simply either.
the issue with Vitalik’s publish imo:
he’s a predefined concept of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont think individuals really are a priori
in my opinion the come after along with the techcfr horse-carriage riders once the motorcar made its intro
generally i believe he’s a gud guy tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
Meanwhile, a residential area member also contended on X that among the issues with your blog publish is Buterin’s predefined concept of humanitarian values. The city member described these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after along with the technology.
Even though many expressed their agreement and disagreements, others simply sitting undecided, saying they expect to participating in humanity’s collective effort to obtain the solutions.
Magazine: Real AI use cases in crypto, No. 1: The very best money for AI is crypto
