three reasons why Ethereum Bang hard fork tokens won’t gain traction

Ether (ETH) is the second biggest crypto by market capital and also the absolute leader in decentralized applications by deposits. Being a victim of their own success, the network possessed a fee hike in November 2021 once the average transaction costs surpassed $50. 

That’s the key reason why the Merge is really a critical key to applying a completely functional scaling solution. The confirmation of the transition to some proof-ofstake (PoS) consensus was the primary driver for that rally toward $2,000 on August. 15.

Investors were partly looking forward to the lower issuing schedule and sure a transition to some deflationary scenario, there is however even the expectation of approaching forks. Consequently, hard-forked coins might be awarded to Ether holders on several blockchains, despite the fact that there is no guarantee individuals will discover traction or sufficient liquidity.

In one side, there is the temptation of free money as well as bonus non-fungible tokens (NFTs) because the forked chain will initiate with similar condition from the original Ethereum network, meaning each address holds the very same contents when it comes to tokens and transaction history.

However, additionally there is a feeling of disappointment after Ether’s agonizing 29% correction that required place following the $2,000 resistance demonstrated to become tougher than expected. It’s entirely possible that as investors recognized the practical utility from the forks could be reduced than anticipated, the exuberant expectation of free money dissipated, and reality kicked in.

ETHPoW, for the time being, is really a possible new chain supported by proof-of-work (Bang) miners. Some exchanges have initiated futures buying and selling for that fork chain native asset, ETHW. Markets appear to possess given their opinion, because the contract has become buying and selling below $55 at Poloniex and Gate.io.

There isn’t any backing and oracle support for forked stablecoins

The 2 leading stablecoins, namely USD Gold coin (USDC) and Tether (USDT), have formally confirmed intentions to solely offer the Ethereum Foundation-backed Merge chain. Cointelegraph formerly reported that since two stablecoins dominate, the issuers’ support “should create a smooth transition for Ethereum.”

Meanwhile, the main team behind EthereumPoW (ETHW) stated they’d temporarily freeze tokens in a few liquidity pools of DeFi applications to safeguard user assets following the hard fork.

The thought of freezing users’ assets without their consent did not match many. Quite a few users known as the Twitter account behind EthereumPoW a gimmick since the community has voted on no such change.

DApps exceed just facilitating transactions because, because they communicate with exterior data, request off-chain computing which is where blockchain oracle technology is necessary.

Chainlink enhances smart contracts by linking all of them with real-world data, occasions and transactions. Within an official announcement on August. 8, the protocol says its services would stick to the Ethereum PoS blockchain that is based on the Ethereum Foundation.

Related: MakerDAO co-founder recommends DAI-USD depegging to limit the attack surface

Leading DApps will incentivize users to ditch forked tokens

On August. 16, Aave (AAVE) holders were requested to get familiar with voting to” commit” to Ethereum’s PoS consensus, giving capacity to an expert to seal lower any Aave deployments on what other Ethereum forks.

Despite being designed solely being an Ethereum application, Aave is becoming interchain through the years and presently has its own official versions running on Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Fantom and Harmony.

Investors are beginning to understand the DApps and stablecoins won’t support forked chains, meaning the “free” tokens and NFTs are less inclined to be recognized in marketplaces and leading DeFi applications. Whatever the ETHPoW token value, the utility from the PoS network based on the Ethereum Foundation exceeds the utility of competing chains.

Ethereum Classic never acquired traction

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is really a pre-existing example that props up thesis that the competing chain won’t undermine Ether’s (ETH) cost. The initial hard fork adopted a 2016 consensus change and aimed to reverse a $60 million exploit. The DApps about this competing proof-of-work (Bang) chain never acquired traction despite its $4.5 billion market capital.

Current data shows that Ether traders should neglect the approaching forks and concentrate on the roadmap toward scalability and set up network maintains its position because the leader by total value locked.

The views and opinions expressed listed here are exclusively individuals from the author and don’t always reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and buying and selling move involves risk. You need to conduct your personal research when making the decision.

Latest stories

You might also like...